Wednesday, 6 November 2013
Galaxy S5 and other Samsung phones will have 560 ppi displays next year launches
LG G Flex phone bend and not break
You probably know that the LG G Flex and Samsung Galaxy Round have something in common: their curved displays. The G Flex has a special little trick up its sleeve that sets it apart, however. It can physically flex without breaking.
Lay the G Flex down screen-first on a flat surface and you can actually push on its back hard enough to flatten it out without damaging the phone. Not visibly, anyway.
No, it’s really not bending all that much… but would you want to try bending your iPhone 5S or Galaxy Note 3 like this?
This still isn’t the kind of thing you probably want to do on an ongoing basis. While the self-healing back and arched display on G Flex can clearly tolerate the abuse for the duration of a demo video or two, the other internal components might not be as forgiving.
And although LG’s been working on its flexible battery for a while now, more than a few people are bound to be squeamish about repeatedly bending their smartphone’s most volatile component.
So while the Galaxy Round’s curved display has been widely criticized for being little more a gimmick by many it’s clear that the LG G Flex actually offers some very clear benefits.
Real innovation in smartphones isn’t quite as common as it used to be, so it’s nice to see something from a manufacturer like LG that really is new, different, and — perhaps most importantly — a real improvement.
Sunday, 13 October 2013
Leaked Galaxy S4 Mini in Black Mist, White Frost and Pink Colors
Thursday, 3 October 2013
Samsung Galaxy Gear quick thoughts: What it’s like to use today’s smartest smartwatch
Samsung Galaxy Gear quick thoughts: What it’s like to use today’s smartest smartwatch
The Galaxy Gear smartwatch’s release date is this week so, ahead of that point, I took the time to test it out. I did so alongside Samsung’s Galaxy Note 3 smartphone and the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) tablet. The three are inextricably linked as the Galaxy Gear only works with the Galaxy Note 3 or the Note 10.1 (for now), and they share a common release window here in the US.
To get a good look at the Galaxy Gear in action, check out the gallery above. Once you have an idea of how it works, the video below will add some context and walk through the smartwatch’s interesting, but somewhat limited, feature set. After that I’ll chime in with some quick observations.
Setting up the Galaxy Gear with the Note 3 was easy enough. You pair the two and then after that you’ll never again have to think about the connection between the two. The watch will give you an alert when the phone is out of range. That shouldn’t be a problem though, as the range is excellent. The watch looks sharp, but it’s not comfortable. The length of the face means that it just doesn’t sit well on the wrist. The band isn’t that bad, but that’s not good enough, as it’s not replaceable. Speaking of the band, on the bottom of it is a big metal bulge that appears to be a speaker. It’s not a problem when you are wearing it, but try to use a laptop and your wrist will have to sit well above the palm rest. Plus you’ll have some uncomfortable metal-on-metal action.
Here is an image taken with the watch while it was on my wrist. I can’t complain about the quality given the small size of the sensor and the challenge of placing it on the band.
Finally, some brief closing thoughts: At $300 I think the Galaxy Gear is a cool toy, but unfortunately the sweet gadgety goodness of the smartwatch is defeated by the facts that this thing is clunky, uncomfortable, and orange (OK, not all the models are orange, but still… it’s neon orange). I really believe that Samsung did a respectable job here, they just were limited by what could be done with today’s tech and what is a feasible price. Given how expensive watches can be, I wonder if it would have made sense to increase the price and deliver a better experience, if that’s something Samsung could have pulled off.
Ultimately I think that the Galaxy Gear is an interesting, non-catastrophic product, but it’s not in line with my priorities. I’m not a watch guy, but if I was I’d need a replaceable band, for it to be comfortable enough that I’d forget I was wearing it, it would have to be somewhat inconspicuous, and I’d happily trade off a number features for size and battery life.
For those reasons I think an e-paper based product that’s slightly less slick, but ultimately more usable would be a better fit for me and many other people. That said, I respect Samsung’s ability to tackle a serious design challenge and offer up a passably good, everything-but-the-kitchen sink smartwatch for this price. Now they just need to get it to work with more phones (tablet’s don’t really matter here) so that it can be taken seriously.
Wednesday, 2 October 2013
Samsung Galaxy gear full review
SAMSUNG GALAXY GEAR
FULL REVIEW
Samsung isn’t the first company to build a smartwatch, but there’s no question that the Galaxy Gear is the most highly-anticipated entrant into the category to date. Now that it’s here, does the Galaxy Gear live up to the hype? Reviewers across the web have had some time to evaluate Samsung’s Android-powered watch. What do they think of it? Unsurprisingly, it’s a mixed bag — though there is some consensus on a few points. Take the Galaxy Gear’s price tag, for example. Everyone from PCmag to Wired to Engadget to Fox News agrees that it’s a hard to recommend at $300. The Gear been praised as a well-built device with a premium feel, but limited compatibility (it only works with the Galaxy Note 3 for now) is a huge turn-off. If you look past the price tag, there are plenty of positives. The Galaxy Gear’s battery life is generally considered “better than expected.” It was noted that after a day of average use that the battery was still about 65% charged. On more active days, it still had about 30% remaining. Fox and ZDnet had similar experiences, with the former calling it “surprisingly decent.” AnandTech attempted to come up with an actual runtime. With the screen’s brightness set to 4 out of 5, they managed to squeeze out just over five hours of continuous use. That’s pretty impressive, considering how many individual interactions it should take to reach that total. Then again, it falls well short of the e-Ink Pebble — which only needs to be charged about once a week. That’s the price you pay for a bright, full-color OLED display, of course. That, and slight difficulty reading when you’re outside. Gizmodo notes that the Galaxy Gear can be tricky to use in direct sunlight, though it’s nice and readable in other conditions. The watch gets dinged again for its outside performance because it’s not waterproof. Yes, it can handle a little bit of forearm perspiration. No, you shouldn’t leave it on your wrist while you wash your hands or if you’re jogging out in the drizzle. At $300 the Gear ought to be waterproof — particularly when tech-heads are going to compare it to the waterproof, $149 Pebble. How about those voice commands? With no on-screen keyboard, S-Voice handles basic interactions with aplomb. Stuff like checking the weather, dictating text messages, and dialing a call is no problem for the Galaxy Gear. It can, however, be frustratingly slow –Wired says that it was often faster to pull the Note 3 out, unlock it, and send a message from there instead.
On a more positive note, the Galaxy Gear got several thumbs up for its humble 1.9-megapixel camera. It won’t capture any prize-winning photos for you, but it’ll do in a pinch. It also works nicely with Samsung’s S-Note app and with Evernote — which can handle stills and video as well as up to two minutes of audio from the Gear’s microphone.
All told, the Galaxy Gear is a decent effort from Samsung. For all but the most cutting-edge gadget lovers, however, the majority of reviewers say to wait for version 2.0… or at least to hold off until there are more apps and Samsung offers support for more phones.
Samsung is Claimed to Boost The Galaxy Note 3 Benchmarks to Show Better Performance
Tuesday, 1 October 2013
Samsung Says First Gold S4 Was Sold Even Before The Gold iPhone Was Announced Rgyaan
Apple released its two new iPhone’s on 10th September 2013, iPhone 5c and 5s. iPhone 5s was launched with the new color ‘gold’ and since then, we have seen leaks for HTC phones going Gold but in the recent news we saw Samsung Galaxy S4 in gold color. On Friday, Samsung posted to the company’s blog, Samsung indirectly acknowledged the popularity of Apple’s new gold iPhone 5S by posting a gallery where they showed all the phones launched in gold color by them(including Gold S4 ). The blog said: “Everybody loves gold, which is why we sometimes make phones in that color. (Or sometimes even with actual gold for the body!) See below to check out some of the phones we’ve released in gold in the past” The blog post was likely crafted in response to voices on social media channels like Twitter that took Samsung to task for claiming (indirectly) earlier in the week that it had a gold smartphone on the market before the iPhone.